MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995557844 · doi:10.1063/1.1618219

The Renner-Teller effect and Sears resonances in the ground state of the GeCH and GeCD free radicals

2003· article· en· W1995557844 on OpenAlexafffund
Sheng‐Gui He, Haiyang Li, Tony C. Smith, Dennis J. Clouthier, A. J. Merer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of KentuckyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIsotopomersChemistryFermi resonanceGround stateAtomic physicsVibronic couplingResonance (particle physics)RadicalKinetic isotope effectVibronic spectroscopySpectral lineCoupling (piping)SpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MoleculeDeuteriumPhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vibrational energy levels of the jet-cooled GeCH and GeCD radicals have been studied by a combination of laser-induced fluorescence and wavelength-resolved emission techniques. The radicals were produced in a pulsed electric discharge free jet expansion using methyltrichlorogermane and tetramethylgermane-d12 precursors. A re-examination of the weaker hot bands in the LIF spectrum has provided a more complete vibrational analysis of the upper state energy levels. The single vibronic level emission spectra obtained by pumping several bands of each isotopomer were analyzed to provide information on the low-lying ground state vibronic energy levels up to 3000 cm−1 above the zero-point level. Strong interactions occur in these molecules between vibronic levels with the same value of P, but differing by one unit of v2; such interactions were first described for NCS by Northrup and Sears [Mol. Phys. 71, 45 (1990)] and are conveniently called “Sears resonances.” The spectra of GeCH were further complicated by Fermi resonances between the bending and Ge–C stretching levels. Despite these difficulties, it proved possible to analyze the data using a standard Renner-Teller model with the addition of Sears resonance coupling terms. The validity of the fitted parameters was tested using the isotope relations. The Sears resonance parameters for GeCH are much larger than those of NCS, a result of the much stronger vibronic coupling in the germanium methylidynes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207