SDIVIP<sup>2</sup>: shared data integrity verification with identity privacy preserving in mobile clouds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Mobile networks integrate cloud computing to impair the weaknesses of the mobile terminals. With mobile cloud storage, mobile users can fully enjoy the advantages from both mobile networks and cloud storage. However, a major concern of mobile users is how to guarantee the integrity of their outsourced data. Taking into account the mobility of mobile devices, in this paper, we propose a shared data integrity verification protocol with identity privacy preserving, named SDIVIP 2 , for mobile cloud storage. In the construction of SDIVIP 2 , the dynamic group key agreement technique is employed for key sharing among a group of mobile users and the proxy re‐signature mechanism is utilized to update tags efficiently when users in the group change. In this new protocol, a third party auditor is able to verify the correctness of cloud data without the knowledge of mobile users' identities during the data integrity checking process. Performance analysis demonstrates that SDIVIP 2 outperforms the existing schemes in the sense that it can significantly enhance the efficiency of mobile users' joining and leaving a group. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it