MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995620779 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20063

Characteristics of anthraquinone hydrogenation catalysts in a liquid‐solid fluidized bed

2008· article· en· W1995620779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen Guanqun, Tao Zhou, Hongzhong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSluggingFluidized bedFluidizationThermodynamicsExpansion ratioAnthraquinoneMaterials scienceViscosityParticle sizeParticle (ecology)ChemistryChromatographyMechanicsComposite materialFlow (mathematics)PhysicsOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The fluidization characteristics of anthraquinone hydrogenation catalysts were investigated in a liquid–solid fluidized bed. The effects of the initial bed conditions such as particle size, bed depth‐to‐column diameter ratio and liquid density and viscosity on the fluidization behaviour, bed expansion and applicability of the Richardson–Zaki equation were studied. The results reveal a strong particle size effect on the Richardson–Zaki (R‐Z) expansion index which in general decreased as the particle diameter increased. One type of particles exhibited two distinct bed expansion behaviours, depending mainly on the bed depth‐to‐column diameter ratio, with an experimentally established boundary at $h_{\rm b}0/D \approx 1.75$ . This behaviour could be attributed to increasing wall friction and a tendency to exhibit slugging. The dependence of the Richardson–Zaki exponent on the liquid dynamic viscosity confirms the classic result $n_{\rm a} = f(1/Re_{t})$ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207