Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of an Electrically Actuated Piezoelectric Laminated Microbeam With the Effect of AC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents not a nonlinear static research but dynamic anlysis for an electrically actuated piezoelectric laminated micro-beam. On the basis of the Euler-Bernoulli hypothesis, and the responses under electric force [a purely direct current and a combined current composed of a direct current and an alternating current] are investigated, respectively. By using the Taylor series expansion, a set of governing equations of nonlinear integro-differential type is derived. Then using the Galerkin method and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, an analytical is presented. Numerical examples show, when a purely DC is applied, there exist an instantaneous pull-in voltage, under the combined current, not only the direct current voltage and the amplitude of the alternating current voltage can make the piezoelastic laminated microbeam collapse, but also the different voltage parameter of it can affect the pull-in phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".