Les inégalités scolaires d’une régulation de l’éducation par le marché : le point de vue des professeurs du secteur public de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article brosse un tableau succinct de la nouvelle régulation de l’éducation en insistant surtout sur l’orientation démocratique que le ministère de l’Éducation comptait donner à la décentralisation, et présente ce que les enseignants disent des tensions qui existent désormais dans le système d’éducation entre une logique démocratique orientée vers la protection des élèves menacés d’échec scolaire, voire d’exclusion sociale, et une certaine logique libérale plus axée sur le droit des parents de choisir des services d’éducation et la libre concurrence entre les établissements, ce qui peut conduire à de nouvelles formes d’inégalités devant l’éducation. L’article montre que les enseignants donnent massivement la priorité dans leurs discours aux droits des parents, mais que plusieurs enseignants cherchent néanmoins, syncrétiquement, à concilier ce droit des parents avec des valeurs démocratiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".