MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995666220 · doi:10.5539/apr.v2n1p66

Conception and Realization of Sun Tracking System in the South-West of Algeria

2010· article· en· W1995666220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mhamed Rebhi, Mabrouk Sellam, Boufeldja Kadri

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkyPhotovoltaic systemTilt (camera)Tracking (education)Inclined planeSolar trackerSolar energyLatitudeRealization (probability)Computer scienceTracking systemHorizontal planeMaximum power point trackingEnergy transformationRadiationEnvironmental sciencePhysicsPower (physics)OpticsMeteorologyGeodesyElectrical engineeringGeologyAstronomyEngineeringMechanical engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this work is to show, in the solar energy converting systems applications as photovoltaic orthermal, the interest of solar tracking system compared to those fixed, south facing and inclined at an optimalangle or a horizontal plane.Our application is to realize and study the performances of sun tracking system prototype allowing thepermanent orientation of the PV module in opposition to incident radiation during the day; hence it permits toincrease the output energy and the conversion efficiencyFor a state of sky completely or almost clearly, a solar tracking plane enables use to recover an average 27.48%from the gain of energy compared to fixed system; however , our device is able to deliver a maximal power andbest conversion efficiency compared with a fixed module oriented by tilt angle 30° identical with the latitude ofthe site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207