MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995687771 · doi:10.1039/c4dt03283g

Structural and luminescence studies of the new nitridomagnesoaluminate CaMg<sub>2</sub>AlN<sub>3</sub>

2014· article· en· W1995687771 on OpenAlexafffund
Mariusz Kubus, Kirill Levin, Scott Kroeker, David Enseling, Thomas Jüstel, Hans‐Jürgen Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des relations internationales et de la FrancophonieUniversity of OttawaOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsLuminescenceCrystallographyTetrahedronSpace groupLattice constantDiffractionSolid solutionMaterials scienceTernary operationIonChemistryX-ray crystallographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CaMg(2)AlN(3) was synthesized in a closed system by solid state reaction from binary nitrides. Structure refinements based on powder X-ray diffraction data suggested ambiguity about the occupancy of magnesium and aluminum tetrahedral sites. Solid-state (27)Al and (25)Mg NMR studies were used to adjudicate amongst possible space groups. With reference to projector augmented wave calculations of the quadrupolar coupling constants, the measured values of CQ and the numbers of crystallographically inequivalent Al and Mg sites indicate that CaMg(2)AlN(3) crystallizes in the space group P6(3)/mmc with partial occupancy of the distorted tetrahedral Al site and possibly also mixing of Mg(2+) and Al(3+) ions on opposite sites. The compound obtained by synthesis with a flux shows orange defect-related luminescence at room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207