Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We developed a sparse multichannel blind deconvolution (SMBD) method. The method is a modification of the multichannel blind deconvolution technique often called Euclid deconvolution, in which the multichannel impulse response of the earth is estimated by solving an homogeneous system of equations. Classical Euclid deconvolution is unstable in the presence of noise and requires the correct estimation of the length of the seismic wavelet. The proposed method, on the other hand, can tolerate moderate levels of noise and does not require a priori knowledge of the length of the wavelet. SMBD solves the homogeneous system of equations arising in Euclid deconvolution by imposing sparsity on the unknown multichannel impulse response. Trivial solutions to the aforementioned homogeneous system of equations are avoided by seeking sparse solutions on the unit sphere. We tested SMBD with synthetic and real data examples. Synthetic examples were used to judge the viability of the method in terms of noise. We found that SMBD gives reasonable estimates of the wavelet and reflectivity series for S/N≥4. The results clearly deteriorated when we tried to work on data that were severely contaminated by noise. A real marine data set was also used to test SMBD. In this case, the estimated wavelet was compared with a wavelet estimated by averaging first breaks. The estimated wavelet showed a noticeable resemblance to the average first break with normalized correlation coefficient of 0.92.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".