MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995705968 · doi:10.1139/p06-077

Sum rules for an atomic hyperfine structure in a magnetic field

2006· article· en· W1995705968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperfine structurePhysicsMultipletMagnetic fieldNuclear magnetic momentMagnetic momentElectron magnetic dipole momentAtomic physicsField (mathematics)Spin (aerodynamics)ElectronSpin magnetic momentMagnetic energyMagnetic dipoleQuantum mechanicsMagnetizationSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sum rules for the energy levels of a hyperfine multiplet in a constant uniform magnetic field are presented. It is found that for any value of the electron angular moment and the nuclear spin there are certain linear combinations of energy levels that do not depend on the magnetic field and can be used to determine the unperturbed hyperfine-structure separation in the presence of a perturbing magnetic field. It is also demonstrated that there are other linear combinations that are linear with the external magnetic field and hence can be used to determine bound values of the electron and nuclear magnetic moments. The accuracy of the approximation within which the result is valid is also discussed.PACS Nos.: 32.10.Fn, 32.60.+i1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it