A preliminary assessment of the effects of <i>Didymosphenia geminata</i> nuisance growths on the structure and diversity of diatom assemblages of the Restigouche River basin, Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In June 2006, blooms of Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) M. Schmidt were observed for the first time in the Matapedia River, Quebec. This species can produce nuisance-level epilithic algal mats in oligotrophic rivers with stable flows. The lack of knowledge surrounding the potential impacts of nuisance growths on lotic ecosystems has raised concerns. Periphyton communities were sampled in three rivers of the Restigouche watershed to assess the effects of D. geminata nuisance growths on surrounding diatom assemblages. This study provides a preliminary assessment of the effect of D. geminata on the species composition of diatom assemblages and the influence of increased biofilm complexity on species diversity. Our results show that D. geminata mats have an effect on the structure and diversity of diatom assemblages. Conversely, we found no evidence that an increase in Standing Crop Index (SCI) further impacted diatom diversity or structure of these assemblages. This preliminary study contributes to the growing knowledge of the biology and impact of D. geminata in lotic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".