Inhibition fields for phyllotactic pattern formation: a simulation studyThis article is one of a selection of papers published on the Special Theme of Shoot Apical Meristems.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most theories of phyllotaxis are based on the idea that the formation of new primordia is inhibited by the proximity of older primordia. Several mechanisms that could result in such an inhibition have been proposed, including mechanical interactions, diffusion of a chemical inhibitor, and signaling by actively transported substances. Despite the apparent diversity of these mechanisms, their pattern-generation properties can be captured in a unified manner by inhibition fields surrounding the existing primordia. In this paper, we introduce a class of fields that depend on both the spatial distribution and the age of previously formed primordia. Using current techniques to create geometrically realistic, growing apex surfaces, we show that such fields can robustly generate a wide range of spiral, multijugate, and whorled phyllotactic patterns and their transitions. The mathematical form of the inhibition fields suggests research directions for future studies of phyllotactic patterning mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".