MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995730340 · doi:10.1109/isbi.2013.6556625

Vessel Walker: Coronary arteries segmentation using random walks and hessian-based vesselness filter

2013· article· en· W1995730340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHessian matrixSegmentationArtificial intelligenceRandom walker algorithmComputer scienceComputer visionImage segmentationFilter (signal processing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Coronary arteriesRandom walkMathematicsPixelArteryMedicineStatisticsCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The segmentation of vascular structures from 2D X-ray angiographies is an important step for vessel measurement, diagnosis and treatment planning. Segmentation of such structures can be challenging due to the vessel appearance and topology. In this paper, we propose a novel interactive method to segment vascular structures by combining Hessian-based vesselness information and the random walk formulation, in which manually selected seed points can be used to refine the segmentation result. The proposed method was tested on coronary arteries angiograms and has shown to be more accurate than an active contour-based method or the Random Walker algorithm, with a mean AUC of 97.2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207