MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995744101 · doi:10.1109/icmcs.2012.6320294

Rotation invariant fuzzy shape contexts based on Eigenshapes and fourier transforms for efficient radiological image retrieval

2012· article· en· W1995744101 on OpenAlexafffund
Alaidine Ben Ayed, Mustapha Kardouchi, Sid‐Ahmed Selouani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceHistogramInvariant (physics)Computer visionFourier transformRotation (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceFast Fourier transformImage retrievalFeature extractionFeature vectorTranslation (biology)MathematicsAlgorithmImage (mathematics)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new descriptor for radiological image retrieval. The proposed approach is based on fuzzy shape contexts, Fourier transforms and Eigenshapes. At first, fuzzy shape context histograms are computed. Then, a 2D FFT is performed on each 2D histogram to achieve rotation invariance. Next, histograms are projected onto a lower dimensionality feature space. The new space is more representative. It highlights the most important variations between shapes. Eigenshapes are the principal components for radiological images. The proposed approach is translation, scale and rotation invariant. Classes of the medical IRMA database are used for experiments. Comparison with the known approach rotation invariant shape contexts based on feature-space Fourier transformation proves that the proposed method is faster, more robust to local deformations and more efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207