Thermal Decomposition of Acetic and Formic Acid Catalyzed by Red Mud—Implications for the Potential Use of Red Mud as a Pyrolysis Bio-Oil Upgrading Catalyst§Dedicated to Prof. Ulf Schuchardt on the occasion of his retirement.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acetic and formic acid impart a high acidity on pyrolysis bio-oil (obtained by fast pyrolysis of ligno-cellulosic biomass), which is one of the factors preventing its direct use as a fuel. At temperatures ≥ 330 °C, Red Mud, a waste byproduct of the aluminum industry produced at >70 million tons p.a., is a good catalyst for thermal decomposition of these acids. Formic acid can serve as an internal source of hydrogen through the formation of synthesis gas and the water gas shift reaction. The formation of C 6 −C 10 hydrocarbons in the nonpolar phase of the resulting product mixture and the identification of C 3 and C 4 hydrocarbons and CO 2 in the gas phase and acetone in the polar liquid phases can be rationalized through mechanisms involving ketene as the intermediate formed by acetic acid dehydration, with subsequent formation of acetone. Higher hydrocarbons, mostly alkanes and alkenes, are then formed through iterative aldol condensation, hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, and deoxygenation reactions of the primary products. During the reaction, the Red Mud used in these reactions undergoes a distinct color change to gray, yielding a nonalkaline magnetic material containing Fe 3 O 4 and metallic iron rather than Fe 2 O 3 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it