MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF EXTRACTS OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS FROM RAPESEED OIL CAKES

2001· article· en· W1995768746 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Lipids · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRapeseedAbsorbanceFood scienceAntioxidantMoistureWater contentRelative humidityChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Oil cakes were prepared from commercial rapeseeds of the double‐low Bolko variety using a complete technological line. Samples of the oil cake containing 8.1, 9.9, 11.4, and 14.4% moisture were stored for 1, 2 and 3 months at 15C and a relative humidity of 78%. The content of total phenolics in the extracts so obtained did not depend on the moisture content of the oil cake or the length of storage; values ranged from 77 to 81 mg/g. In the extract obtained from nonpressed rapeseeds, a similar content of total phenolics (80 mg/g) was determined. UV spectra of the extracts studied were characterized by maximum absorbance at 330 nm. This wavelength indicates that sinapine was the main phenolic compound in the extracts. However, the extract obtained from the cake with the lowest moisture content and stored for 3 months exhibited a maximum absorbance at 328 nm. All the extracts showed good antioxidant activity, as assessed using a β‐carotenelinoleate model system. Antioxidative properties of extracts obtained from rapeseed cakes were similar to those of extracts from nonpressed seeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it