Multiple Element Antenna Efficiency and its Impact on Diversity and Capacity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A desirable characteristic of a multiple element antenna (MEA) is to be compact, but a smaller size tends to lead to higher ohmic and mutual coupling losses. A metric for the efficiency of the MEA would help clarify the tradeoffs between compactness and performance. In a MIMO/diversity antenna, the total efficiency seen at each port directly affects the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the diversity branch. The SNR after diversity combining governs the performance of the diversity antenna system. In this paper, MEA efficiencies is therefore discussed and formulated in the context of mutual coupling and diversity combining. The impact of MEA efficiency on the diversity gain and the information theoretical capacity is also formulated and demonstrated using measurements of example MEAs. With these formulations, an equivalent number of idealized (lossless, uncorrelated, uncoupled, equal power) branches can be found for an MEA, and this defines the diversity order and the capacity order of the MEA. With this metric, the performance of different MEAs can be compared.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it