MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995810528 · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(10)36533-5

Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: analysis of prevalence data from 19 countries

2010· article· en· W1995810528 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Devries, Sunita Kishor, Holly Johnson, Heidi Stöckl, Loraine Bacchus, Claudia García‐Moreno, Charlotte Watts

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health Matters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsDomestic violencePregnancyMedicineDemographyLatin AmericansEnvironmental healthPoison controlSuicide preventionPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We aimed to describe the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy across 19 countries, and examine trends across age groups and UN regions. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (20 surveys from 15 countries) and the International Violence Against Women Surveys (4 surveys from 4 countries) carried out between 1998 and 2007. Our data suggest that intimate partner violence during a pregnancy is a common experience. The prevalence of IPV during pregnancy ranged from approximately 2.0% in Australia, Cambodia, Denmark and the Philippines to 13.5% in Uganda among ever-pregnant, ever-partnered women; half of the surveys estimated prevalence to be between 3.9 and 8.7%. Prevalence appeared to be higher in African and Latin American countries relative to the European and Asian countries surveyed. In most settings, prevalence was relatively constant in the younger age groups (age 15–35), and then appeared to decline very slightly after age 35. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy is more common than some maternal health conditions routinely screened for in antenatal care. Global initiatives to reduce maternal mortality and improve maternal health must devote increased attention to violence against women, particularly violence during pregnancy.RésuméNous souhaitions décrire la prévalence de la violence exercée sur les femmes enceintes par un partenaire intime dans 19 pays, et examiner les tendances par groupes d'âge et régions des Nations Unies. Nous avons mené une analyse secondaire des données d'enquêtes démographiques et sanitaires (20 enquêtes dans 15 pays) et d'enquêtes internationales sur la violence faite aux femmes (quatre enquêtes dans quatre pays) réalisées entre 1998 et 2007. Nos données indiquent que la violence du partenaire intime pendant la grossesse est fréquente. Sa prévalence allait d'environ 2,0% en Australie, au Cambodge, au Danemark et aux Philippines à 13,5% en Ouganda parmi les femmes ayant déjà été enceintes et ayant déjà eu un partenaire ; la moitié des enquêtes estimaient cette prévalence entre 3,9 et 8,7%. La prévalence semblait plus élevée dans les pays d'Afrique et d'Amérique latine que dans les pays d'Europe et d'Asie ayant fait l'objet des enquêtes. Dans la plupart des pays, la prévalence était relativement constante dans les groupes d'âge les plus jeunes (15–35 ans) et semblait décliner très légèrement après 35 ans. La violence du partenaire intime pendant la grossesse est plus fréquente que certaines conditions de santé maternelle qui font l'objet d'un dépistage systématique dans les consultations prénatales. Les initiatives mondiales pour réduire la mortalité maternelle et améliorer la santé maternelle doivent consacrer davantage d'attention à la violence faite aux femmes, en particulier pendant la grossesse.ResumenNos propusimos describir la prevalencia de violencia de pareja íntima (VPI) durante el embarazo en 19 países y examinar las tendencias en diferentes grupos etarios y regiones de la ONU. Realizamos un análisis de datos secundarios de las Encuestas Demográficas y de Salud (20 encuestas de 15 países) y de las Encuestas Internacionales sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres (4 encuestas de 4 países) realizadas entre 1998 y 2007. Nuestros datos indican que la violencia de pareja íntima durante el embarazo es una experiencia común. La prevalencia de la VPI durante el embarazo varió de un 2.0% en Australia, Camboya, Dinamarca y Filipinas al 13.5% en Uganda entre mujeres alguna vez embarazadas, que alguna vez tuvieron pareja; la mitad de las encuestas calcularon una prevalencia del 3.9% al 8.7%. La prevalencia pareció ser más alta en países africanos y latinoamericanos comparada con los países europeos y asiáticos encuestados. En la mayoría de los entornos, la prevalencia era relativamente constante en los grupos más jóvenes (de 15 a 35 años) y pareció disminuir muy poco después de los 35 años de edad. La violencia de pareja íntima durante el embarazo es más común que algunos problemas de salud materna para los cuales se hacen pruebas de detección sistemática durante la atención antenatal. Las iniciativas internacionales por disminuir la tasa de mortalidad materna y mejorar la salud materna deben dedicar mayor atención a la violencia contra las mujeres, particularmente la violencia durante el embarazo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations512
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive Health MattersSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207