Unilateral Cataracts: Is Successful Amblyopia Therapy Compatible with Binocular Vision?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two case studies are used to illustrate the importance of balancing the postsurgical achievement of high-level visual acuity with the acquisition of stereopsis in cases of unilateral cataract. Traditional management will be reviewed and limited occlusion therapy will be discussed. A structured occlusion regime that allows for increased binocular opportunity is promoted for use upon cataract removal. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Two cases are reviewed in which a unilateral cataract was removed and a full-time intensive patching schedule was followed. RESULTS: Both patients reviewed have no measurable depth perception and are bothered by intractable diplopia. CONCLUSION: Promoting good visual acuity in unilateral cataract management is the primary objective. Good visual acuity can be achieved with reduction of occlusion intensity in order to allow for some form of binocularity to develop, lowering the risk for strabismus and intractable diplopia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".