MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995884647 · doi:10.7202/015043ar

Succès social et succès reproductif dans les sociétés modernes : une analyse sociobiologique

2003· article· fr· W1995884647 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Pérusse

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Succès social et succès reproductif dans les sociétés modernes : une analyse sociobiologique Dans cet article, nous présentons l'hypothèse sociobiologique voulant qu'il existe une relation positive entre le succès social et le succès reproductif chez les individus. Cette question se révèle particulièrement significative en ce qu'elle récapitule le rapport entre le comportement culturel et ses déterminants évolutifs. Nous proposons un modèle théorique détaillé de la relation, et nous en vérifions la validité par une revue des recherches pertinentes effectuées au sein des sociétés modernes, où le rapport entre les deux formes de succès apparaft le moins évident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.291
GPT teacher head0.595
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFrench-language works237,207