MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiple Courses of Antenatal Corticosteroids for Preterm Birth (MACS): A Randomized Controlled Trial

2009· article· en· W1995906379 on OpenAlexaff
Kellie E. Murphy, Mary E. Hannah, Andrew R. Willan, Sheila Hewson, Arne Ohlsson, Edmond Kelly, Stephen G. Matthews, Saroj Saigal, Elizabeth Asztalos, Susan Ross, Marie‐France Delisle, Kofi Amankwah, Patricia Guselle, Amiram Gafni, Shoo K. Lee, Anthony Armson

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaRespiratory distressRandomized controlled trialNecrotizing enterocolitisPediatricsGestationIntraventricular hemorrhagePregnancyNeonatal respiratory distress syndromeObstetricsPlaceboMulticenter trialGestational ageSurgeryMulticenter study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although a single course of antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth reduces the risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), neonatal mortality and morbidity, the benefits may diminish over time. The effects of weekly doses have been investigated but the benefits are unclear, and there is evidence of decreased fetal growth and other short-term and long-term adverse effects. MACS is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids provide short-term respiratory benefits and minimize the risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This trial enrolled 1858 women at 25 to 32 weeks’ gestation who had not delivered 14 to 21 days after an initial course of antenatal corticosteroids and remained at high risk for preterm birth. The study was conducted at 80 centers in 20 countries. The study subjects were randomized to receive either antenatal corticosteroids (n = 937) or placebo (n = 921), every 14 days until week 33 or delivery, whichever came first. The primary study outcome was a composite of perinatal or neonatal mortality, or clinically significant neonatal morbidity, which was defined as severe RDS, bronchopulmonary dysplasia intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, cystic periventricular leucomalacia, or necrotizing enterocolitis. All patients and caregivers were blinded as to the treatment given. No difference in primary outcomes of morbidity and mortality was found between infants receiving multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids or placebo (150 [12.9%] vs. 143 [12.5%], P = 0.83). At birth, in comparison to the placebo, infants who received multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids weighed less (2216 vs. 2330 g, P < 0.0026), were shorter (44.5 vs. 45.4 cm, P < 0.001), and had a smaller head circumference (31.1 vs. 31.7 cm, P < 0.001). These data show that multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids given every 14 days are associated with decreased growth in utero and provide no neonatal benefits compared with 1 course of antenatal corticosteroids. The investigators conclude from these findings that multiple courses every 14 days are not recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.265
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.265
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207