MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995937793 · doi:10.1109/ieeegcc.2009.5734335

Methodologies for data mining and modeling of atmospheric pollutants

2009· article· en· W1995937793 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed F. Yassin, Fayez Gebali

Bibliographic record

Venueexhibition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlumeAtmospheric dispersion modelingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPollutantPlanetary boundary layerTurbulenceWind speedPoint sourceVisibilityAtmospheric sciencesBoundary layerGeologyAir pollutionPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A datacube model for atmospheric pollutants is presented in this work. The value of interest is flux of pollutant deposition versus several attributes such as pollutant type, location, geographic scale, etc. We present also an analytical model for the effect of wind gusts on the pollutant distribution. The model takes into account random variations in wind speed and instrumentation noise. We consider the case of a figures neutrally buoyant plume emitted from an elevated point source in a turbulent boundary layer. The results show that wind turbulence is an important factor in the dispersion plume distribution and leads to spreading the distribution due to wind mixing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueexhibitionSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207