MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995943771 · doi:10.12745/et.5.1.618

Book Review: Margareta de Grazia and Stanley Wells (eds). <em>The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

2002· article· en· W1995943771 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Hyland

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Theatre · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyMedia studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ostovich's brilliantly layered analysis of The Magnetic Lady, however, we find Jonson staking out a position at the centre of patriarchal pretension, where women who slip from under male controls are shown to be stupidly transgressive, lascivious, duplicitous, 'leagued in a devilish compact', and inclined to infanticide ('The Appropriation of Pleasure in The Magnetic Lady', 106).But see also Simon Morgan-Russell's '"No Good Thing Ever Comes Out of It": Male Expectation and Female Alliance in Dekker and Webster's Westward Ho', where an alliance of 'citizen Wives' successfully establishes a powerful alternative to male homosociality, 83).Only occasionally, when women write for and about women, do they seem able to elide male claims of agency and dominion.Two late seventeenth-century women, for instance, found in the learning and rhetorical powers of Elizabeth I a viable model for women to emulate (Lisa Gim, '"Faire Eliza's Chaine": Two Female Writers' Literary Links to Queen Elizabeth'.)Harriette Andreadis, in 'The Erotics of Female Friendship in Early Modern England', works out with exquisite precision ways in which mostly high-born women in the late seventeenth-and early eighteenth-centuries allowed themselves to express female same-sex intimacy in the 'sexually evasive yet erotically charged language of female friendship' (241).See too, perhaps, Jessica Tvordi, 'Female Alliance and the Construction of Homoeroticism in As You Like It and Twelfth Night'.In life, if not in literature, however, even the remarkably successful and ferociously independent society of women founded by Mary Ward, though it was able to stave off episcopal authority and the constraints of women's religious communities for a time, was finally all but destroyed by papal power (Lowell Gallagher, 'Mary Ward's "Jesuitresses" and the Construction of a Typological Community').Nonetheless, as this anthology demonstrates so well, alliances in the early modern period formed by women, reinforced by the power of their own learning and intelligence, were able to accrue to themselves increased social and civic responsibility along with heightened realization of their own interior identities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly TheatreSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207