MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995951409 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6091490

Identification of CpG islands in DNA sequences using matched filters

2011· article· en· W1995951409 on OpenAlexaff
Rajasekhar Kakumani, M. Omair Ahmad, V. Devabhaktuni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCpG siteIdentification (biology)Computational biologyDNA sequencingComputer scienceDNAMatched filterGeneGeneticsFilter (signal processing)BiologyDNA methylationGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CpG islands (CGIs), rich in CG dinucleotides, are usually located in the promoter regions of genes in DNA sequences and are used as gene markers. Identification of CGIs plays an important role in the analysis of DNA sequences. In this paper, we propose a new digital signal processing (DSP) based approach using matched filters for the identification of CGIs. We also formulate a new/reliable CGI identification characteristic replacing the several existing probability transition tables for CGIs and non-CGIs. The peaks in matched filter output, obtained by correlating the CGI characteristic with the DNA sequence to be analyzed, accurately and reliably identify CGIs. This approach is tested on a number of DNA sequences and is proved to be capable of identifying CpG islands efficiently and reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFractal and DNA sequence analysisFrench-language works237,207