MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995969044 · doi:10.3406/galia.2006.3285

Die (Drôme) : de la ville ouverte à la ville fortifiée

2006· article· fr· W1995969044 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Planchon

Bibliographic record

VenueGallia · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les vestiges de la ville antique de Die - notamment son rempart - laissent entrevoir l’évolution complexe de cette agglomération gallo-romaine. Vraisemblablement simple relais de bord de voie au début du Ier s., Die acquiert un caractère véritablement urbain avant le début du IIe s., et c’est dans une ville ouverte que sont transférées les institutions de la capitale nord des Voconces vers le milieu du IIe s. Au IIIe s., la cité devient colonie et une part importante de l’agglomération s’entoure d’un rempart, laissant de côté certains quartiers périphériques qui semblent être déjà abandonnés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGalliaSame topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207