MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995973104 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2014.6848540

A multi-resolution FDTD method for uncertainty quantification in the time-domain modeling of microwave structures

2014· article· en· W1995973104 on OpenAlexaff
Luyu Wang, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodRobustness (evolution)Polynomial chaosComputer scienceAlgorithmGridUncertainty quantificationMicrowave imagingMonte Carlo methodSparse gridWaveletMicrowaveComputational scienceMathematicsOpticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research on parameter uncertainty quantification via the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method has led to several approaches aimed at outperforming the conventional Monte-Carlo technique. Among those, the use of polynomial chaos (PC) is characterized by mathematical robustness and computational efficiency. However, it still requires either multiple FDTD runs (in non-intrusive PC methods) or the execution of one large simulation to compute the PC expansion coefficients for all field nodes and time steps (in the intrusive case). This paper presents an intrusive PC-FDTD method stemming from a wavelet-based PC expansion of field components, with respect to the uncertain parameters. This multi-resolution expansion implements a sparse adaptive grid in the uncertain parameter space, which produces significant performance gains, without sacrificing accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207