MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995973420 · doi:10.1115/imece2012-85615

A New Nonlinear Higher-Order Shear Deformation Theory With Thickness Variation for Large-Amplitude Vibrations of Laminated Doubly Curved Shells

2012· article· en· W1995973420 on OpenAlex
Marco Amabili

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemCurvilinear coordinatesVibrationAmplitudeGeometryShear (geology)Shell (structure)MechanicsDeformation (meteorology)PhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisStructural engineeringMathematicsMaterials scienceOpticsEngineeringAcousticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A consistent higher-order shear deformation nonlinear theory is developed for shells of generic shape allowing for thickness variation by using six variables; geometric imperfections are also taken into account. The geometrically nonlinear strain-displacement relationships are derived retaining full nonlinear terms in the in-plane displacements. They are presented in curvilinear coordinates in a formulation that can be readily implemented in computer codes. This new theory is applied to laminated circular cylindrical shells complete around the circumference and simply supported at the ends. Linear (natural frequencies) and geometrically nonlinear (large-amplitude forced response) vibrations are studies by using the present theory and results are compared to those obtained by using the refined Amabili-Reddy higher-order shear deformation nonlinear shell theory, which neglects thickness variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it