MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995978940 · doi:10.1353/ail.2006.0029

Kill the Indian, Save the Man: The Genocidal Impact of American Indian Residential Schools (review)

2006· article· en· W1995978940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beverly Slapin

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocideHistoryNothingIndigenousPoliticsTinkerCasualIndex (typography)Media studiesLawSociologyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Kill the Indian, Save the Man: The Genocidal Impact of American Indian Residential Schools Beverly Slapin (bio) Ward Churchill . Kill the Indian, Save the Man: The Genocidal Impact of American Indian Residential Schools. San Francisco: City Lights, 2004. 157 pages. Churchill's latest diatribe is a single essay, with an incomprehensible yet self-serving preface by George E. Tinker: [End Page 141] The scope of demystification Churchill has pursued over the past twenty years or more has evolved to include nearly the full inventory of "interpretive techniques" . . . with which North America's settler intelligentsia has sought to expunge from the accuracy of memory certain actualities attending its forbears' initial "encounters" and subsequent "interactions" with the continent's indigenous peoples. (xvii) In miniscule type, the eighty-five pages of notes, bibliography, and index outweigh the actual text in verbiage and match it in pomposity. Many of the notes reference Churchill's earlier works and arguments. (See, for instance, note 64: "For additional samples of Churchill's rebuttals of those who would deliberately distort the definition of genocide for political reasons, see . . . ") There's nothing new here, except to note that Churchill's massive ego has grown even more. For narratives from people who had survived the boarding schools, he relies heavily on Brenda Child's Boarding School Seasons (University of Nebraska Press, 1998) and David Wallace Adams's Education for Extinction (University Press of Kansas, 1995), at the same time excoriating Adams for not using the term "genocide." Kill the Indian, Save the Man is part of Churchill's A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas, 1492 to the Present (City Lights, 1997), expanded, reargued, and made even more unreadable. From the introduction: I have by design engaged in no new research while assembling my essay. Instead, to underscore the obviousness of what is being obfuscated and "denied" by "responsible" scholars, I've chosen to rely exclusively on previously published data, most of it long and readily accessible to anyone willing to consider its implications. My main contribution to the literature, I think—aside from offering the first comparative assessment of residential school operations and impacts covering both the U.S. and Canada—is thus to have effected a synthesis of the relevant information, configuring it in a manner facilitating its being scrutinized through the lens of legality. [End Page 142] Yet Churchill's bibliography contains sixty-nine references to material published after 1997, the year A Little Matter of Genocide was published. He did not reference, however, Roland Chrisjohn's excellent essay "The Report," part of "Residential Schools: The Past is Present," by Michele Cheung, in Dark Night field notes, no. 17/annual issue 2001, in which Chrisjohn writes, "What happened with reservation schooling wasn't kind of like genocide, it wasn't cultural genocide, it wasn't something approximating genocide. It was genocide." Churchill had to have known about it, because he was on the editorial board. What he has seen fit to cite is Linda F. Witmer's questionable-at-best The Indian School: Carlisle, Pennsylvania, 1879–1918 (Cumberland County Historical Society, 2000) and Michael S. Cooper's abominable children's book Indian School: Teaching the White Man's Way (New York: Clarion Books, 1999), which Churchill describes as "a good, and very succinct study of how these principles were imposed in the U.S." Kill the Indian, Save the Man also contains a lot of archival residential school photos, randomly placed and some inappropriately captioned. See, for instance, the photo of little Richard Kissiti (Apache) at age four, captioned as being the "youngest 'student' at Carlisle in 1895." He was not a student, even if the word is surrounded by quote marks. His story is very painful, and apparently Churchill didn't feel it was necessary to tell (assuming he bothered to find out). Beverly Slapin Beverly Slapin is cofounder and executive director of Oyate, coeditor of Through Indian Eyes: The Native Experience in Books for Children and A Broken Flute: The Native Experience in Books for Children, and a frequent contributor to Multicultural Review. She has garnered infamy, but not wealth, from her two books, The Basic Skills Caucasian Americans...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207