Low Ozone Episodes at Amphitrite Point Marine Boundary Layer Observatory, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At Amphitrite Point, ozone (O3) mixing ratios are observed to drop steadily to 5–15 ppb over a period of 12 hours or less with a frequency approaching one event per week (with highest frequencies occurring in summer and fall). Analysis of 47 such O3 depletion events reveals that low O3 episodes are a predominantly nocturnal phenomenon associated with anticyclonic conditions characterized by light onshore or alongshore winds and an absence of fog and mist. Back-trajectories show air carried to the Amphitrite Point Observatory (APO) during depletion events remains in the marine boundary layer and is not brought to the surface from aloft. There is no strong correlation with other “criteria” pollutants (CO, NOx, SO2, PM2.5) that might be indicative of a mechanism for O3 destruction linked to human, terrestrial, or marine pollutant sources. However, CO2 mixing ratios are observed to increase, coincident with O3 depletion. Together, these results point to a natural marine boundary layer phenomenon in which O3 destruction dominates O3 production and/or replenishment by vertical mixing. While there are several candidate mechanisms, the conditions for O3 depletion (and CO2 buildup) to occur are set by meteorology and, in particular, development of a stable marine boundary layer in which vertical mixing is suppressed. Support for this interpretation is provided by simultaneous increases in CO2 in the stable marine boundary that are indicative of an important role played by marine biogenic processes (respiration). Future research should be directed at elucidating the chemical mechanisms responsible for O3 destruction in the coastal zone, which means that there would be a need for a much broader range of measurements at APO (including halogenated species) as well as offshore measurements of both chemical and marine boundary layer meteorological variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".