MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996012783 · doi:10.1142/s0129055x08003274

SINGULAR FERMI SURFACES I: GENERAL POWER COUNTING AND HIGHER DIMENSIONAL CASES

2008· article· en· W1996012783 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mathematical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeFermi surfaceQuasiparticlePerturbation (astronomy)Dispersion relationFermi gasQuantum oscillations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove regularity properties of the self-energy, to all orders in perturbation theory, for systems with singular Fermi surfaces which contain Van Hove points where the gradient of the dispersion relation vanishes. In this paper, we show for spatial dimensions d ≥ 3 that despite the Van Hove singularity, the overlapping loop bounds we proved together with E. Trubowitz for regular non-nested Fermi surfaces [J. Stat. Phys.84 (1996) 1209–1336] still hold, provided that the Fermi surface satisfies a no-nesting condition. This implies that for a fixed interacting Fermi surface, the self-energy is a continuously differentiable function of frequency and momentum, so that the quasiparticle weight and the Fermi velocity remain close to their values in the noninteracting system to all orders in perturbation theory. In a companion paper, we treat the more singular two-dimensional case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it