Desempenho ocupacional de adolescentes escolares com excesso de peso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Overweight in adolescence is becoming a public health problem, has multifactorial causes and generates consequences that may impair the performance of occupations in various areas of life of the subjects. Objective: To identify the problem-activities of adolescents who attend school and who are overweight/obese. Methodological Procedures: A cross-sectional and descriptive study of adolescents aged 13 – 18 years attending a private school in the city of Recife. A questionnaire was applied requiring data on the independent variables; Body Mass Index was calculated for the classifi cation of overweight/obesity, and occupational performance was assessed by the Canadian Measurement of Occupational Performance. Results: Of the initial sample of 86 adolescents, 14 presented excess weight, 10 of them being overweight and 4 obese. Sedentary activities, inadequate consumption of food and insuffi cient physical activity were important variables. The problem activities most frequently reported fell within the domains: functioning in the community, functional mobility, school and active recreation. Conclusions: Diffi culties were found in the occupational performance of the adolescents with overweight/obesity, mainly in their productive and leisure activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".