MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996046262 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0004

Idle Employment and Dickens’s Uncommercial Ruse: The Narratorial Entity in “The Uncommercial Traveller”

2014· article· en· W1996046262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jasper Schelstraete

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonaEntertainmentLiteratureComputer scienceHistoryArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charles Dickens’s narratorial entity in “The Uncommercial Traveller” represents a dramatic shift away from the more traditional narrators Dickens deployed in earlier sketches. By consciously and unequivocally blending his established editorial and authorial personae in the “uncommercial” narrator, Dickens sought to close the distance between his performed selves and his audiences. These sketches seek to position Dickens in the literary marketplace through explicit and implicit disavowals of commerciality. Readers were not necessarily taken in, but the tongue-in-cheek rejection of financially motivated writing works to create an implicit understanding between the narratorial persona and his audience: that entertainment and leisure are the author’s business.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207