MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996053349 · doi:10.1086/662664

Gill Remodeling in Crucian Carp during Sustained Exercise and the Effect on Subsequent Swimming Performance

2011· article· en· W1996053349 on OpenAlexaff
Colin J. Brauner, Victoria Matey, W. Zhang, Jeffrey G. Richards, Rashpal S. Dhillon, Z.-D. Cao, Y. Wang, Shi‐Jian Fu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological and Biochemical Zoology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCrucian carpGillBiologyHypoxia (environmental)Animal scienceAnatomyInternal medicineOxygenEndocrinologyFish <Actinopterygii>ChemistryFisheryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gill remodeling can be extensive in crucian carp, where up to a 7.5-fold increase in gill surface area has been observed during exposure to hypoxia through a reduction in the interlamellar cell mass (ILCM) and increased lamellar protrusion that has been hypothesized to be signaled by the need to maximize oxygen uptake under a given condition. Sustained aerobic exercise may have the greatest influence on oxygen demand in fish; however, its effect on gill remodeling in crucian carp has not been investigated. The specific objectives of this study were to determine (i) whether sustained aerobic exercise induces gill remodeling in the crucian carp, (ii) whether gill remodeling following sustained exercise affects the maximum critical swimming speed (U(crit)) and maximal oxygen consumption rate ([Formula: see text]), and (iii) whether gill remodeling following sustained exercise is associated with trade-offs related to ionoregulation. We measured [Formula: see text] in crucian carp at each step during an initial U(crit) test (U(crit1)), forced them to swim at 70% of U(crit) for 40 h, and then conducted a second U(crit) test (U(crit2)). From rest to U(crit1) (7-8 h), we observed a significant increase in protruding lamella height and area of the gills and a reduction in ILCM height and volume, likely associated with partial shedding of the ILCM, indicating that gill remodeling during exercise is rapid. Further changes were observed between U(crit1) and U(crit2), with statistically significant increases in protruding lamellar height, basal length and area, and a statistically significant reduction in protruding lamellar thickness and ILCM height and volume. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between U(crit1) and U(crit2) values, nor in maximal [Formula: see text] measured at U(crit1) and U(crit2). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in plasma osmolarity, [Na(+)], or [Cl(-)] in fish at rest, following U(crit1) or U(crit2). Thus, while these data support the hypothesis that the need to maximize oxygen uptake is an important signal for gill remodeling, which can occur quite rapidly (within 7 h at 15°C), the physiological implications of remodeling during exercise are less clear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological and Biochemical ZoologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207