MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996066331 · doi:10.1139/b09-074

Getting around the legume nodule: I. The structure of the peripheral zone in four nodule types

2009· article· en· W1996066331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNodule (geology)MeristemLegumeRoot noduleBotanyFabaceaeArachis hypogaeaRhizobiaSymbiosisPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nodules in the family Leguminosae come in many different shapes and forms, depending partly on the host that bears them. This review focuses on the peripheral tissues that surround the infected tissues of four anatomically distinct classes of nodules: nodules with indeterminate meristems (from the Trifolieae and Fabeae tribes); desmodioid nodules with determinate meristems (from the Phaseoleae and Loteae tribes); aeschynomenoid nodules ( Arachis hypogaea L., peanut); and lupinoid nodules ( Lupinus sp. L., lupine). I have especially stressed the importance of the three-dimensionality of the organ, because not all nodules display a radial symmetry as it is often assumed. The goal of this review is to provide a strong base of nodule structure so that forthcoming molecular studies can integrate this information into their approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it