MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996068252 · doi:10.1353/utq.2010.0075

Wagner and the Wonder of Art: An Introduction to Die Meistersinger (review)

2010· article· en· W1996068252 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Joseph K. So

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWonderOperaStyle (visual arts)ArtArt historyPhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Wagner and the Wonder of Art: An Introduction to Die Meistersinger Joseph K. So (bio) M. Owen Lee . Wagner and the Wonder of Art: An Introduction to Die Meistersinger. University of Toronto Press 2007. xii, 134. $45.00, $18.95 Father M. Owen Lee is Canada's foremost authority on the music of Wagner. For avid readers of his large body of work, the ideas expressed in this slim volume on Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg will have a familiar ring. I vividly recall attending an engrossing lecture he gave on this back in the early 1980s, a brilliant and insightful analysis of this most joyous of Wagner's operas that has stayed with me all these years. Much of the material in this volume has previously appeared in First Intermissions, a collection of Metropolitan Opera intermission talks Father Lee gave over the years, and in his much-praised Wagner: The Terrible Man and His Truthful Art. Also included is a complete transcript of 'Wagner and the Wonder of Art,' a talk he gave on Die Meistersinger that was featured on the first Met broadcast after the horrific events of 9/11. Heard by millions over the radio - myself included - his words offered solace and spiritual uplift for those deeply saddened by the mass destruction and the loss of life. So it is good to have all the material collected in one volume, written in his highly readable and accessible style. Of the six chapters in the book, the first three are devoted to an analysis of the opera. His equating the structure of the three-act opera to that of a 'master-song,' with the first and second Stollen of equal length followed by a longer Abgesang has always struck me as an inspired metaphor. In the three short chapters, the author gives us more than just a simple [End Page 470] synopsis of the story, by focusing on the wealth of ideas inherent in the opera. He sees act 3, the Abgesang, as the heart of the work, in which Wagner delineates his philosophy on art, one that is 'fashioned from both intuition and craftsmanship . . . innovating spirit and respect for tradition.' As an anthropologist, I must say this statement has great resonance in my own field - this philosophy applies to not just art but to society at large. As Father Lee explains in the preface, one of the reasons for this book is his wish to respond to the charges made in recent years by some writers against Die Meistersinger. This can be found in chapter 4, entitled 'Controversies.' In the space of eleven pages, he mounts a spirited yet entirely scholarly and reasoned defence of this work from the attacks of those who claim to have revealed a 'dark underside' to Die Meistersinger, one of insidious German cultural/racial imperialism and particularly anti-Semitism. The author refrains from naming any names, referring to the naysayers as a 'coterie of academic writers,' although for those familiar with the discourse, these individuals are well known. Father Lee provides cogent arguments against the charges levelled at Sachs's final address to Walther, as well as the notion that Wagner's treatment of Beckmesser reflects the composer's distaste for Jews. Separating Wagner the man from Wagner the composer, Father Lee makes a convincing case that these charges against the opera per se are misplaced. Even at the grand age of seventy-nine, Father Lee continues to think and write when his health permits. I dare say that we may yet enjoy more scintillating ideas from him. But for now, I consider this brilliant analysis of Die Meistersinger Father Lee's own Abgesang. [End Page 471] Joseph K. So Joseph So, Department of Anthropology, Trent University Copyright © 2010 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207