MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996073972 · doi:10.1021/ic801229c

Circular Dichroism of Trigonal Dihedral Chromium(III) Complexes: A Theoretical Study based on Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

2008· article· en· W1996073972 on OpenAlexafffund
Jing Fan, Michael Seth, Jochen Autschbach, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDihedral angleDensity functional theoryEthylenediamineOxalateGround stateOpen shellCircular dichroismCrystallographyChromiumVibrational circular dichroismSpectral lineMalonateSign (mathematics)Computational chemistryAtomic physicsInorganic chemistryMoleculeHydrogen bondQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spin-unrestricted time-dependent density functional theory has been applied to the electronic circular dichroism spectra of Cr(III) complexes with an open-shell ground state, that is, [Cr(L-L)(3)](n+) with L-L = en(ethylenediamine), acac(acetylacetonate), ox(oxalate), mal(malonate), and Thiox(dithiooxalate). The simulated CD spectra are analyzed in details and compared with experimental data, as well as previous calculations on similar Co(III) complexes where available. The theoretical results serve as a tool for elucidating the absolute configuration of similar complexes, by pointing to transitions for which the sign of the rotatory strength can be used as fingerprint for one particular configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207