MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996100560 · doi:10.1002/mame.201570004

Back Cover: Macromol. Mater. Eng. 1/2015

2015· paratext· en· W1996100560 on OpenAlexaff
Davoud Jahani, A. Ameli, Mehdi Saniei, WeiDan Ding, Chul B. Park, Hani E. Naguib

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2015
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolycarbonateCover (algebra)Composite materialMolding (decorative)ThermalPolymer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back Cover: Highly expanded open-cell polycarbonate foams are developed using an injection molding process. The foams are characterized in terms of their mechanical properties as well as for sound and thermal insulations. The test results show that the newly developed foams improve sound and thermal insulations up to 2.5 and 5 times, respectively. Further details can be found in the article by D. Jahani, A. Ameli, M. Saniei, W. Ding, C. B. Park,* and H. E. Naguib on page 48.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5870.380

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Materials and EngineeringSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207