MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Resistance Training in Patients with Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis and Malalignment

2008· article· en· W1996109312 on OpenAlexaff
Crystal O. Kean, Trevor B. Birmingham, Lauren King, Dianne L. Edwards, J. Robert Giffin

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyKnee painGaitKnee JointPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 12-week high-intensity knee extensor and flexor isokinetic resistance training program on strength, pain and adherence in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) and varus malalignment. The secondary objective was to examine the effects of the resistance training program on function, self-efficacy and dynamic knee joint load during gait. METHODS: Fourteen patients (48.35 ± 6.51 yrs) with radiographically confirmed medial compartment knee OA and varus malalignment of the lower limb were recruited from a waiting list of patients scheduled for high tibial osteotomy. Participants completed a 12-week isokinetic training program. Isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength was assessed at baseline, weeks 3, 6, 9 and post training. Pain and adherence were recorded at each training session. The 6-minute-walk test, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) and external knee adduction moment during gait were evaluated pre and post training. RESULTS: Following training, there were significant improvements (20-30%) in knee extensor and flexor strength (p = 0.001). There was no increase in pain throughout or following the training program (p>0.05). Adherence was high with participants attending an average of 31.8 (± 2.6) out 36 sessions. There was a significant increase in the function subscale of the ASES (p =0.02). No significant changes were observed for knee adduction moment during gait or function although individual data varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest patients with advanced knee OA and malalignment can experience substantial gains in strength following resistance training without concomitant increases in pain or compromised adherence. Although we did not see increases in functional performance, the increased scores on the function subscale of the ASES indicate patients are more confident in their functional abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→