MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996113438 · doi:10.3406/reg.2009.7944

Usages rhétoriques et poétiques des clausules accentuelles dans le roman de Xénophon d’Éphèse

2009· article· en· W1996113438 on OpenAlex
Michèle Biraud

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des Études Grecques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhythmPoetryRhetoricPeriod (music)Opposition (politics)ArtLinguisticsLiteratureHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The possibility of creating accentual (and no metric) clausulae appeared with the phonetic evolution of the Greek language which, towards the end of the Hellenistic period, replaced the quantitative rhythm, based on the opposition of length of syllables, by an accentual rhythm, based on the equality of distances between the accented syllables of the stressed words. This innovation, which goes back at least to Parthenios of Nicaea, is used by Xenophon of Ephesos in some passages of his novel in order to give them a rhythm at the end of every period∞∞ ; the recurrence of several clausulae can even define several levels of the rhetoric organisation of the passage. In other excerpts, the density of these accentual clausulae is such – they appear at the end of each colon – that their use is no more rhetoric but poetic (similar to that of the rhymes in French poetry).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it