MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996117552 · doi:10.1134/s1061920812010104

Integral representations for the Lagrange polynomials, Shively’s pseudo-Laguerre polynomials, and the generalized Bessel polynomials

2012· article· en· W1996117552 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Mathematical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLaguerre polynomialsWilson polynomialsClassical orthogonal polynomialsOrthogonal polynomialsBessel polynomialsDiscrete orthogonal polynomialsDifference polynomialsGeneralized hypergeometric functionHahn polynomialsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsJacobi polynomialsGegenbauer polynomialsHypergeometric function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated essentially by their potential for applications in the mathematical, physical, and statistical sciences, the object of this paper is to investigate several general families of hypergeometric polynomials and their associated multiple integral representations. By suitably specializing the main results presented here, the corresponding integral representations are derived for familiar simpler classes of hypergeometric polynomials such as (for example) the Lagrange polynomials, Shively’s pseudo-Laguerre polynomials, and generalized Bessel polynomials. Each of the integral representations derived in this paper may be also viewed as a linearization relationship for the product of two different members of the associated family of hypergeometric polynomials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it