MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Performance Multi-Wafer SiC Epitaxy – First Results of Using a 10x100mm Reactor

2010· article· en· W1996128192 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Hecht, René Stein, Bernd Thomas, Larissa Wehrhahn-Kilian, Jonas Rosberg, Hiroya Kitahata, Frank Wischmeyer

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaferMaterials scienceEpitaxyOptoelectronicsLayer (electronics)Deposition (geology)DopingComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present first results of epitaxial layer deposition using a novel warm-wall CVD multi-wafer system AIX 2800G4 WW from AIXTRON with a capability of processing 10x100mm wafers per run. Intra-wafer and wafer-to-wafer homogeneities of doping and thickness for full-loaded 10x100mm runs will be shown and compared to results of the 6x100mm setup of our hot-wall reactor VP2000HW by AIXTRON used for device production since 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207