MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996133445 · doi:10.1080/j006v26n01_02

Gender Differences in the Attainment of Motor Skills on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children

2006· article· en· W1996133445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovement assessmentMotor skillPsychologyAnalysis of varianceTest (biology)Psychomotor learningDevelopmental psychologyGross motor skillPhysical therapyMedicineCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differences in the age of attainment of motor skills between boys and girls have been established in previous studies. It has been noted that boys develop ball skills earlier than girls and that girls acquire manual dexterity before boys. The purpose of this study was to determine if the same differences could be identified in a group of typically developing seven and eight year old children using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children Test (MABC Test). In this study, a physiotherapist administered the MABC Test to 103 randomly selected children (boys-60, girls-43). The MABC Test examines children's motor skills in the areas of manual dexterity, ball skills and balance. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The ANOVA results indicated significant differences between boys' and girls' ball skill scores and manual dexterity scores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it