MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996147736 · doi:10.1109/istas.2013.6613098

Augmediated reality system based on 3D camera selfgesture sensing

2013· article· en· W1996147736 on OpenAlexafffund
Raymond Lo, Alexander Chen, Valmiki Rampersad, Jason Huang, Han Wu, Steve Mann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceComputer visionGesture recognitionWearable computerArtificial intelligenceAugmented realityContext (archaeology)Computer graphics (images)Embedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-Dimensional (3D) range cameras have recently appeared in the marketplace for use in surveillance (e.g. cameras affixed to inanimate objects) applications. We present FreeGlass™ as a wearable hands-free 3D gesture-sensing Digital Eye Glass system. FreeGlass comprises a head-mounted display with an infrared range camera, both connected to a wearable computer. It is based on the MannGlas™ computerized welding glass, which embodies HDR (High Dynamic Range) and AR (Augmented/Augmediated Reality). FreeGlass recontextualizes the 3D range camera as a sousveillance (e.g. cameras attached to people) camera. In this sousveillance context, the range camera is worn by the user and shares the same point-of-view as the user. Computer vision algorithms therefore benefit from the use of the range camera to allow image segmentation by using both the infrared and depth information from the device for 3D hand gesture recognition system. The gesture recognition is then accomplished by using a neural network on the segmented hand. Recognized gestures are used to provide the user with interactions in an augmediated reality environment. Additionally, we present applications of FreeGlass for serendipitous gesture recognition in everyday life, as well as for interaction with real-world objects (with and without gesture recognition). A plurality of FreeGlass units can be used together, each sensor having a different spreading sequence, or the like, so that a number of people can collaborate and share the same or similar Augmediated Reality space(s).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207