MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996156042 · doi:10.1142/s0219498811005221

ON STRONGLY *-CLEAN RINGS

2011· article· en· W1996156042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdempotenceRing (chemistry)Unit (ring theory)MathematicsProjection (relational algebra)Element (criminal law)Pure mathematicsVon Neumann regular ringVon Neumann architecturePrimitive ringPrincipal ideal ringChemistryLawCommutative ringPolitical scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A *-ring R is called a *-clean ring if every element of R is the sum of a unit and a projection, and R is called a strongly *-clean ring if every element of R is the sum of a unit and a projection that commute with each other. These concepts were introduced and discussed recently by [L. Vaš, *-Clean rings; some clean and almost clean Baer *-rings and von Neumann algebras, J. Algebra324 (2010) 3388–3400]. Here it is proved that a *-ring R is strongly *-clean if and only if R is an abelian, *-clean ring if and only if R is a clean ring such that every idempotent is a projection. As consequences, various examples of strongly *-clean rings are constructed and, in particular, two questions raised in [L. Vaš, *-Clean rings; some clean and almost clean Baer *-rings and von Neumann algebras, J. Algebra324 (2010) 3388–3400] are answered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it