Salivary slgA and Cortisol: Markers for Functional Dependence in Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elderly persons with health problems and physical limitations have reduced independence. Since poor functional ability is a known risk factor for disease among older populations, including oral disease, this study was undertaken to assess whether salivary defense factors and the stress hormone cortisol are significant markers for functional dependence. Oral examinations; salivary and microbial analyses; and interviews using the Activities of Daily Living (ADD index, the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and the Perceived Life Stress Questionnaire (PLSQ) were conducted for 123 dentate subjects. Of the subjects, 80 lived independently in the community or in apartments at the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care in Toronto, Canada, and 43 resided in the Baycrest nursing home or the Baycrest Hospital. Whole saliva samples were assayed for total secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), sIgA1, sIgA2, total protein and cortisol using ELISA. Dependent residents in the nursing home/hospital scored significantly lower in the nutritional assessment, had higher mean PLSQ scores, increased total protein and cortisol concentrations, and reduced salivary flow rates in comparison to ambulatory residents in the community/apartments. In multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with functional dependence were: being male, perceiving income as inadequate, having low salivary flow rate and drinking less than 5 cups of water per day. These results indicate that salivary flow and cortisol may be useful markers of functional dependence; however, the ability of these markers to predict functional decline cannot be confirmed until longitudinal studies are conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".