MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996199735 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.011

Clinical Nodal Staging Scores for Bladder Cancer: A Proposal for Preoperative Risk Assessment

2011· article· en· W1996199735 on OpenAlexaff
Shahrokh F. Shariat, Behfar Ehdaie, Michael Rink, Robert S. Svatek, Thomas Chromecki, Harun Fajković, Giacomo Novara, Scott G. David, Siamak Daneshmand, Yves Fradet, Yair Lotan, Arthur I. Sagalowsky, Thomas Clozel, Patrick J. Bastian, Wassim Kassouf, Hans‐Martin Fritsche, Maximilian Burger, Jonathan I. Izawa, Derya Tilki, Firas Abdollah, Felix K.‐H. Chun, Guru Sonpavde, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Douglas S. Scherr, Mithat Gönen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerRisk assessmentGeneral surgeryUrologyCancerOncologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207