MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996204229 · doi:10.1063/1.3647635

How much room for BiGa heteroantisites in GaAs1−<i>x</i>Bi<i>x</i>?

2011· article· en· W1996204229 on OpenAlexaff
G. Ciatto, Paola Alippi, A. Amore Bonapasta, T. Tiedje

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBismuthDensity functional theorySpectral lineAbsorption spectroscopyRelaxation (psychology)Materials scienceChemistryCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsComputational chemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We addressed the issue of bismuth heteroantisite defects (BiGa) in GaAs1−xBix/GaAs epilayers by coupling x-ray absorption spectroscopy at the bismuth edge with density functional theory calculations of the defect structure. Calculations predict a large relaxation of the Bi-As interatomic distances when Bi atoms substitute Ga, however we found no experimental evidence of it. Quantitative analysis of the x-ray absorption spectra allows us to establish a maximum concentration limit for BiGa, which corresponds to about 5% of the total Bi atoms. BiGa do not account for the modifications in the spectra previously attributed to short range ordering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207