<i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>Carbapenemase, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ing responsible for nosocomial infection.Items used during the patient's ocular surgery were confi rmed to be disposable and nonreused.Topical drops of corticosteroids commonly applied during cataract surgery for intraocular lens implantation penetrate ocular structures.An alternative hypothesis is that corticosteroids applied during ocular surgery reactivate a latent ocular infection.Our review indicated that 13 of 19 patients with documented T. whipplei uveitis had received topical or systemic corticosteroids before the diagnosis (Table) (7).Worsening of Whipple disease has been reported in patients receiving corticoid therapy for arthralgia (10).We speculate that our patient had an asymptomatic ocular infection before surgery.This case shows that ocular surgery and use of topical corticosteroids that penetrate ocular structures could reactivate a latent T. whipplei ocular infection.We suggest that patients with postoperative panendophthalmitis be tested for T. whipplei by PCR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.021 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".