Mechanisms of plasmon-enhanced femtosecond laser nanoablation of silicon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We perform plasmon-enhanced femtosecond laser ablation of silicon using gold nanorods to produce sub-diffraction limit features. While the observed hole shape seems inconsistent with calculated field distribution, we show that using a carrier diffusion-based model, both shape and depth of the nanoholes can be reliably explained. The laser energy is first deposited into electron-hole pairs that are created in the nanostructure's enhanced near-field. Those carriers then diffuse and transfer their energy to the silicon lattice, producing ablation. Increased importance of the carrier diffusion process is shown to arise from the extreme localization of the deposited energy around the nanostructure, due to the plasmonic effect. The characteristic shape of holes is revealed as a striking signature of the screened charge carriers-phonon coupling that is shown to channel the heat transfer to the lattice and control ablation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it