MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996239360 · doi:10.1190/1.1876033

Expert answers: Digital geophones

2005· article· en· W1996239360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Satinder Chopra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeophoneComputer scienceData scienceGeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article first appeared in the May 2004 of the CSEG Recorder in the regularly featured column “Expert Answers.” There is widespread interest today on the subject of digital phones and how successful they are in recording seismic data. Due to this subject's importance to land seismic acquisition practitioners worldwide, CSEG editor Satinder Chopra, who posed the questions and edited the answers, made them available to TLE for greater exposure beyond the Canadian geophysical community. Answering the questions are experts Jon Tessman (Input/Output) and Norman Cooper (Mustagh Resources). The text has been edited and reformatted to conform to TLE style and is published with kind permission of CSEG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4960.199

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207