MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996250221 · doi:10.1353/vpr.0.0117

Subversive Supplements: Satirical Title Pages of the Periodical Press in the 1830s

2010· article· en· W1996250221 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brian Maidment

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecadence, Literature, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddlebrowIntellectValue (mathematics)HistoryArt historyArtLiteraturePhilosophyTheologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Subversive Supplements’ is focussed on a group of nearly twenty parodic title pages of magazines and journals produced between 1832 and 1836 as single plate lithographed caricatures. Charles Jameson Grant, a shadowy but prolific satirical artist, was responsible for the bulk of these images, but others were produced by William Newman and John Phillips. As well as their value as evidence of the nature of the complex changes taking place within the print market in this decade, these prints offer an extremely interesting and often hostile comment on the emergence of what might be called ‘middlebrow’ mass circulation periodicals associated, in varying degrees, with a widespread social awareness of ‘the march of intellect’ and its implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicDecadence, Literature, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207